![]() |
|
| [State] | [Response] | [Main page] |
Antropogenous impact
|
One of the more dangerous anthropogenic impacts, is change of habitat, which occurs as a result of expansion of anthropogenic landscape zones. In this way initial ecosystems are completely destroyed on these territories, which again may lead to extinction of the most retained species. It concerns thousands of species. |
![]() |
Radical change of habitat is incompatible with the mode of living for the overwhelming majority of the original individuals. This change takes place during agricultural and industrial development of territories (including mining), the alienation *(separation) for settlements, networks of automobile roads, irrigation and other units. They occupy about 10% of the territory.
Partial habitat change, caused by human activity is connected with global and local environment pollution, selective withdrawal of species, change of moistening conditions, fires, decrease of producents biomass, introduction of alien species. |
Key factors of anthropogenic impact on biological diversity are the following:
|
Anthropogenic impact and nature protection problems in surface geosystems.
|
During the last years, a perceptible damage to the balance between vegetable and animal kingdom has been observed, in connection with an increasing anthropogenic load
|
![]()
There is a threat of existence for about 15% of mammals and 10% of birds.
Because of long-term over-grazing, practically all vegetative communities are subject to degradation to some extent. There was a change of dominance in them. As a minimum, efficiency has decreased in 1.5 time, non-edible, poisonous plants have appeared, erosional processes were intensified.
|
| Region area | Anthropogenic impact in order of diminishing | Nature protection problems | Risk * |
| Chui | Urbanization of territories, transport,irrigated agriculture, hydrotechnic construction | Nature landscapes,soils,atmospheres,biota, water resources | most dangerous |
| Fergana plain pre-mountain | Irrigated agriculture, mining industry,farming territory urbanization, hydro-technic construction | Nature landscapes soils, atmosphere biota, water resources. | most dangerous |
| Issyk-Kul | Irrigated agriculture, transport, cattle grazing, procurements of medicinal plants, hunting | Biota, atmosphere, water resources and soils. | highly dangerous |
| Son-Kul | Cattle-grazing, procurements of medicinal plants, hunting | Biota, Soils | considerable danger |
| Sary-Djaz | cattle-grazing, procurements of medicinal plants, hunting | Biota, soils, nature landscapes | considerable danger |
| Suusamyr | cattle grazing | Biota, Soils | |
| Upper Naryn | cattle grazing, procurement of medicinal plants, hunting | Biota, Soils | considerable danger |
| Chatyr-Kul | cattle grazing, procurement of medicinal plants, hunting | Biota, Soils | moderate danger |
Direct withdrawal from nature.
|
Direct withdrawal occurs when shooting, catching, fishing, picking up, premeditated and unpremeditated destroying of individuals, belonging to one or other species. |
![]() |
Such species as red and grey marmots were the most numerous species of fur-bearing animals previously. With the purpose of elimination of plague hotbeds during the cultivation of highlands, more than 30 million of these rodents were exterminated. Mass extermination of these animals for the purpose of fur procurement led to a complete destruction of them on a larger part of the former zone as well as to a sharp reduction of their number and loss of their reproduction in the rest part of the zone. |
There is an analogous situation with other fur-bearing and big animals - mountain goat, wild boar and earlier with maral. The latter species was widely spread in the Tien- Shan mountains. Now small populations are preserved just in limited section of spruce groves along the Naryn river. Wild boars and pheasants, after their complete extinction were again brought into many regions of the republic from several places where they are still preserved. |
![]() |
|
|
The fish resources do not play any appreciable role in the economy because of its relative scarcity. Even in the better times, in the 50s, a general catch reached about 20 thousand centners. It is totally about 5 kg of fish per capita a year. Now catch has been sharply reduced because of destruction of the former system of cultivation and protection of fishes and strong development of poaching. Over-catching and the decrease of over- fishing are the main reasons for sharp reduction of the number of previously mass species of fishes. |
If in the 1970-s, the average catch of fish comprised 1,300 tonnes per year, in the 1980-s it was reduced on average to 970 tonnes, and in the 1990-s the average catch of fish was already equal to 540 tonnes per year . |
|
The consumer attitude to the branch of the economy and poach during the spawning period, lack of the regular control and purposeful support of quantitative and specific structure of fishes have resulted in reduction of fish potential in the lakes and rivers of the country . The separate species of predatory fishes capable to eat the caviar and young individuals of other fishes were erroneously acclimatised here. One of the reasons for reduction of number and extinction of fishes of commercial significance is the pollution of lakes, reservoirs and rivers water currents with chemical and poisonous weed-killers and pest-killers, industrial and agricultural production wastes, unavailability of measures against illnesses of fishes. Main species of fishery are: trout, marinka, osman, peliad, pike-perch , chebak, chebachek, bream, crucian, sazan. |
References:
|
| [State] | [Response] |